JACKSON, MS – Mississippi lawmakers have introduced House Bill 1484, a controversial proposal aimed at enhancing immigration enforcement within the state. Authored by Representative Justin Keen of DeSoto County and supported by District Attorney Matthew Barton, the bill seeks to establish the “Mississippi Illegal Alien Certified Bounty Hunter Program.”
The proposed program would allow certified bounty hunters to identify and detain undocumented immigrants, earning $1,000 for each successful deportation they help facilitate. The initiative would be overseen by the Mississippi Department of Public Safety, with funding provided through a dedicated state treasury fund.
“This program is a vital step in assisting our law enforcement agencies to better enforce immigration laws and ensure that those in this country unlawfully are sent back to their country of origin,” Barton said. He emphasized the program’s alignment with federal immigration enforcement efforts.
Representative Keen highlighted the dangers posed by undocumented immigration, referencing local tragedies to illustrate the urgency of the issue. “We’ve seen firsthand the danger posed by bad actors and violent criminals who enter this country illegally, like the innocent life of Laken Riley,” Keen said. “President Trump’s administration has made it clear that deporting illegal immigrants is a priority, and we are proud to do our part here in Mississippi to help support his agenda and protect our citizens.”
The bill also introduces the new crime of “illegal trespass by an illegal alien,” a felony punishable by life imprisonment unless federal authorities intervene within 24 hours. Individuals convicted under this provision would also face permanent disqualification from voting, driving, or receiving public benefits in Mississippi.
According to data cited by the bill’s supporters, DeSoto County has seen over 1,000 undocumented immigrants booked into detention during President Biden’s tenure, marking a 150% increase compared to the Trump Administration. Proponents argue the program would reduce strain on local resources and enhance public safety.
Critics of the proposal have raised concerns about potential issues with oversight, enforcement practices, and the broader implications of privatizing immigration enforcement. However, supporters insist the measure is a necessary step toward addressing illegal immigration at the state level.
If passed, the program would take effect on July 1, 2025.
